Connect with us

World

EU state set to brand letter Z associated with Russian invasion as Nazi symbol

Published

on

[ad_1]

With Russian tanks, armoured vehicles, trucks and soldiers sporting the letter, which does not appear in the Russian alphabet, the move is designed to discourage support for the invasion of Ukraine. Already, controversy emerged over the symbol when a Russian gymnast was seen displaying the image on his chest at a medal ceremony.

Now, Nexta, a large Eastern European news network has revealed the news Lithuania is set to ban the sign.

Taking to Twitter to announce the news, the outlet said: “Members of the Lithuanian Parliament have proposed equating the St. George ribbon and the letter Z with Nazi and communist symbols.

“A fine of up to 500 euros will be imposed for their demonstration.”

Replying to the Tweet, many social media users approved the move.

Jane Eyre said: “Totally agree, hope all countries that support Ukraine do the same.”

Whilst Pav said: “Dam right, thank you Lithuania.”

Nazanin continued by saying: “Thank you Lithuania! It is important to identify and call out symbols of hate and weaponized propaganda!

“These are not mere images – they induce terror and must be recognized as weapons of war!”

The Z symbol is being compared to the Nazi Swastika by some.

Across the EU, many nations have banned the displaying of the Swastika.

In France, Germany, Austria and many other nations, the act comes with punitive measures.

However, in the UK and USA, displaying the Swastika is still legal.

READ MORE:
Russia Z symbol meaning: Cult symbol has swept across Putin’s Russia

There are varying views on why Russia is using the letter Z on their equipment and personnel.

The most popular theory used by military experts to explain the symbol is that they were written according to the respective areas where the Russian troops are usually stationed, with Z potentially standing for Zapad, or West in Russian.

Professor Michael Clarke, former director of the defence at RUSI said: “Often these symbols will be location-based – they will be communicating where a unit is heading. If they were only to mark the vehicles as being Russian, you could just use one symbol.”

Speaking to Sky, he continued: “The fact they are different tells you more – they are probably signs which tell you which units are heading to the north-east or north-west of a district, for example.”

DON’T MISS:
Andrew Neil brutally pulls apart Rishi Sunak’s National Insurance rise [REPORT]
NATO to bolster the Eastern flank in warning to Putin [REVEAL]
Pakistan and India left on fence over Ukraine invasion [COMMENT]

Other experts believe the letters were drawn in an attempt to avoid friendly fire.

Some pro-Kremlin Russian military experts have speculated the letter Z stands for the name of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, and the letter V for Vladimir Putin.

The Russian defence ministry itself has not commented on any of the theories, and instead posted on its Instagram channel that Z meant Za pobedu or “for victory” and V stood for “power of truth”.

Yet for many, the symbol has become a sign of support for Russia’s “special operation” in Ukraine.

Should the Z symbol be banned as a Nazi-style icon? What do you think of Russian sportsmen wearing the symbol? Should war be glorified in selling Z symbol merchandise? Let us know what you think by CLICKING HERE and joining the debate in our comments section below – Every Voice Matters!

Just three days after the invasion, the Kremlin-funded state network RT announced on its social media channels it was selling Z merchandise, including T-shirts and hoodies, to show support for Russian troops.

Since then, countless flashmobs across the country have been organised by the authorities, in which young Russians are seen wearing a Z shirt while displaying their support for the war.

The Z letter has also been painted on large Soviet-era apartment blocks and posted on street advertisement signs.



[ad_2]

Entertainment

Pay Attention To Childhood Cancer

Published

on

Childhood Cancer

Childhood cancer is not very common, since it is estimated that for every 100 adults affected by cancer, there is one child who suffers from it. It comprises numerous types of tumors that develop in children and adolescents from 0 to 18 years of age. The most common types are leukemia, brain tumor, lymphomas, and solid tumors such as neuroblastoma and Willms tumor (kidney tumor).

Don’t Ignore Signs

Sometimes the symptoms of childhood cancer can be confused with those of other diseases, so it can take time to obtain a timely diagnosis that allows the disease to be treated in time. In this sense. Most doctors recommend that parents not ignore the signs, among which are persistent bone and abdominal pain, fever without apparent causes for more than a week, bruising or bleeding from the nose or gums, tumor or node growth, weight loss, among others.

Genetic Factors

Genetic factors and malformations play an important role in the onset of the disease, unlike in adults, where environmental factors such as infectious agents, radiation, smoking, minerals, and chemical compounds have a high incidence. In children, the main cause is still unknown.

The Diagnosis 

There are numerous diagnostic tests used to detect childhood cancer; these allow to determine the type of tumor, where it is located and if it has invaded neighboring organs, (if it has metastasized) for which laboratory tests, imaging studies, and biopsies are used. From which the type of treatment to be used to combat the disease will be established.

Medical Treatment

Many doctors give the reassurance that childhood cancer should be treated in institutions where there is a multidisciplinary health team, such as the Cancer Institute. This team consists of pediatric surgeons, radiation oncologists, orthopedists, hematologists, clinical oncologists, psycho-oncologists, among others.

Seek Local Help

The treatment is multidisciplinary, where excellence, professionalism, dedication, avant-garde in medical knowledge are combined, whose main objective is the fight against cancer. You should also consider local centers that offer cancer care Orange County-based.

Read more: Ryan Garcia and Who is Ryan Garcia Net Worth

 

Continue Reading

World

'This is huge' Swedish Air Force jet deployed over Belarus border in threat to Putin

Published

on

[ad_1]

The Scandinavian country is not a member of NATO, but could be ready to trade in its neutral status in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

News of Stockholm’s decision to send a jet was revealed by twitter user Jamming.

They wrote: “Swedish Air Force Korpen active over Poland border area with Belarus.

“Sweden part of surveillance of Belarus and Ukraine!!!

“This is a huge political statement! Update on SwAF Korpen.”

 

The Gulfstream IV aircraft was tracked taking off from Linking airport and then flying towards the city of Grodno in western Belarus.

It was flying at an altitude of just under 12,000 metres at a speed of 836 kilometres per hour.

Although Sweden is not a NATO member, it is an “enhanced opportunity partner” of the military alliance.

The government also signed a statement in 2018 pledging to strengthen its defence cooperation.

Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson rejected calls by opposition parties earlier this month for the country to join NATO.

She argued that such a move would further destabilise Europe.

Her statement came in the wake of threats from Moscow that NATO membership would bring “serious military-political consequences” for Sweden.

However, there is growing public support among Swedes for their country to join the transatlantic military alliance.

A poll conducted in late February by broadcaster SVT found that 41 percent of the public supported NATO membership, while thirty-five percent were against.

It was the first time an opinion study in Sweden had found more people in favour of the country joining NATO than were against it.

MORE TO FOLLOW….



[ad_2]

Continue Reading

World

Putin humiliated: Russia tries and fails to capture defiant Ukraine village for tenth time

Published

on

[ad_1]

Russia has tried and failed to capture the village of the Chornobaevka ten times, according to Ukrainian presidential adviser Aleksey Arestovich. Videos shared by Ukrainian officials online showed the “tenth defeat of the Russian invaders in Chornobaevka”. The continued failures to capture the village comes as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said last night that his country’s forces had “dealt powerful blows” to the Russian military.

Mr Arestovich told a press conference that Russian troops had tried to take Chornobaevka for the tenth time, but the assault again ended in failure.

Following this, the head of the nearby Mykolaiv Regional State Administration Vitaly Kim published a video showing “the defeat” as explosions erupt on the outskirts of the village.

The resolute village has become famous in Ukraine for its defence, as President Zelensky commended Chornobaivka last weekend for fending off six invasions at the time.

He said: “Ukrainian Chornobaivka will go down in war history. This is a place where the Russian military and their commanders have shown themselves for who they truly are – incompetent, capable of simply handing over their people for slaughter.

“Our military has annihilated the invaders near Chornobaivka six times.

“Six times, yet they keep coming back.”

JUST IN: Putin on brink of major RETREAT in Kyiv

Online users ridiculed the latest Russian failures and hailed the Ukrainian defiance, with one Reddit user remarking: “At some point, I think every military intelligence outfit looking at this must be wondering how bad the rot is in the Russian military.”

One user visavillem added: “So this is the 10th time. Are Russians trying to bait Ukrainians to waste ammo with some obsolete/broken equipment, or are they really so stupid, that they keep stepping on the same rake again and again?”

Another user on Reddit adfgqert posted: “The Ukrainian people have resolve and determination that is beyond what I think is normal.

“Beyond inspirational and they bring fighting for what they believe in to a new level for me.” 

This comes amid ongoing setbacks for Russian military forces in the south of the country.

Earlier this week, it was reported that Russia had withdrawn most of its helicopters from a strategic airport in Kherson, in southern Ukraine, according to satellite images.

Kherson has also been the site of several local protests against the occupying Russian soldiers.

The official said: “We can’t corroborate exactly who is in control of Kherson but the point is, it doesn’t appear to be as solidly in Russian control as it was before.

“That would make it very, very difficult for them to make any kind of ground movement on Odesa.

“That would be a significant development, no question about that, in terms of the southern part of the war.” 



[ad_2]

Continue Reading

Trending