Connect with us


'No hands on DNA!' Olaf Scholz follows Emmanuel Macron's lead refusing Russian Covid test




A source said the German chancellery had offered Russia the opportunity to send someone to observe the procedure.

Mr Scholz’s decision not to take a Russian PCR echoes Mr Macron’s refusal to take one due to security concerns over getting tested by the country’s doctors last week.

A picture of Mr Putin and the French President sitting at opposite ends of a notoriously long table struck the internet as the two leaders discussed Moscow’s conflict with the West.

The 13-feet distance between them was no coincidence, with one source telling Reuters: “We knew very well that meant no handshake and that long table. But we could not accept that they get their hands on the president’s DNA.”

READ MORE: Has Putin been SPOOKED? Key sign of Russia’s dramatic U-turn

A second source from Mr Macron’s entourage, who confirmed the president had taken a French PCR test before departure and an antigen test done by his own doctor once in Russia, said: “The Russians told us Putin needed to be kept in a strict health bubble.”

In the morning of Mr Scholz’s and Mr Putin’s meeting, Germany released a statement urging Russia to withdraw troops from the Ukrainian border.

It read: “We believe that it’s clearly Russia’s responsibility to de-escalate the situation.”

Russia’s Interfax news agency on Tuesday cited the country’s defence ministry as saying that some — but not all — of the large-scale drill exercises across the country had concluded.

Nonetheless, while the move signals a potential shift in Moscow’s tone over the row, the Kremlin’s military build-up remains concerning in the eyes of world leaders.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said: “The situation is extremely dangerous and could escalate at any time.”

She added in her statement: “The government in Moscow should withdraw its troops and provide full transparency about its actions – in accordance with the principles by which Russia has pledged to abide, not least within the context of the OSCE.”

Speaking ahead of his trip on Sunday, Mr Scholz claimed there was “a very, very serious threat to peace in Europe”.

Yet, critics have described his approach as not making the severity of the crisis justice.

Russia-Ukraine LIVE: Conflict updates [FOLLOW]
Oil prices surge: Crude hits 7-year high amid Russia-Ukraine tensions [INSIGHT]
Nine countries that could back Putin [ANALYSIS]

The chancellor has held firm on Germany’s opposition to sending requested defensive weapons to Kiev.

He did, however, announce a new loan of €150 million (about £125mn) to support the nation in light of a potential invasion.

The most scrutinised of factors is the country’s heavy reliance on Russian gas and its involvement in the Nord Stream 2 project, which has been portrayed as the cause for the government’s soft stance.

Mr Scholz has in several instances avoided giving a clear answer as to what his view on the gas matter was.

Nord Stream 2, owned by Russia’s state-backed energy giant Gazprom, runs from western Siberia to Germany, doubles the capacity of the already-in-use Nord Stream 1 pipeline.

Construction was completed last September, and if regulators give it the green light to operate, it could heat 26 million German homes at an affordable price.

Washington has labelled the pipeline a geopolitical weapon for Russia to undermine energy and national security.

Germany, meanwhile, insists it is only a commercial project.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Tuesday, the EU’s top diplomat Josep Borrell said: “If there is a war between Russia and Ukraine, Nordstream 2 would not become operational.”

Bloc-wide sanctions are agreed by unanimity, and Mr Borrell appears assured he has the backing of all 27 member states.



Pay Attention To Childhood Cancer



Childhood Cancer

Childhood cancer is not very common, since it is estimated that for every 100 adults affected by cancer, there is one child who suffers from it. It comprises numerous types of tumors that develop in children and adolescents from 0 to 18 years of age. The most common types are leukemia, brain tumor, lymphomas, and solid tumors such as neuroblastoma and Willms tumor (kidney tumor).

Don’t Ignore Signs

Sometimes the symptoms of childhood cancer can be confused with those of other diseases, so it can take time to obtain a timely diagnosis that allows the disease to be treated in time. In this sense. Most doctors recommend that parents not ignore the signs, among which are persistent bone and abdominal pain, fever without apparent causes for more than a week, bruising or bleeding from the nose or gums, tumor or node growth, weight loss, among others.

Genetic Factors

Genetic factors and malformations play an important role in the onset of the disease, unlike in adults, where environmental factors such as infectious agents, radiation, smoking, minerals, and chemical compounds have a high incidence. In children, the main cause is still unknown.

The Diagnosis 

There are numerous diagnostic tests used to detect childhood cancer; these allow to determine the type of tumor, where it is located and if it has invaded neighboring organs, (if it has metastasized) for which laboratory tests, imaging studies, and biopsies are used. From which the type of treatment to be used to combat the disease will be established.

Medical Treatment

Many doctors give the reassurance that childhood cancer should be treated in institutions where there is a multidisciplinary health team, such as the Cancer Institute. This team consists of pediatric surgeons, radiation oncologists, orthopedists, hematologists, clinical oncologists, psycho-oncologists, among others.

Seek Local Help

The treatment is multidisciplinary, where excellence, professionalism, dedication, avant-garde in medical knowledge are combined, whose main objective is the fight against cancer. You should also consider local centers that offer cancer care Orange County-based.

Read more: Ryan Garcia and Who is Ryan Garcia Net Worth


Continue Reading


'This is huge' Swedish Air Force jet deployed over Belarus border in threat to Putin




The Scandinavian country is not a member of NATO, but could be ready to trade in its neutral status in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

News of Stockholm’s decision to send a jet was revealed by twitter user Jamming.

They wrote: “Swedish Air Force Korpen active over Poland border area with Belarus.

“Sweden part of surveillance of Belarus and Ukraine!!!

“This is a huge political statement! Update on SwAF Korpen.”


The Gulfstream IV aircraft was tracked taking off from Linking airport and then flying towards the city of Grodno in western Belarus.

It was flying at an altitude of just under 12,000 metres at a speed of 836 kilometres per hour.

Although Sweden is not a NATO member, it is an “enhanced opportunity partner” of the military alliance.

The government also signed a statement in 2018 pledging to strengthen its defence cooperation.

Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson rejected calls by opposition parties earlier this month for the country to join NATO.

She argued that such a move would further destabilise Europe.

Her statement came in the wake of threats from Moscow that NATO membership would bring “serious military-political consequences” for Sweden.

However, there is growing public support among Swedes for their country to join the transatlantic military alliance.

A poll conducted in late February by broadcaster SVT found that 41 percent of the public supported NATO membership, while thirty-five percent were against.

It was the first time an opinion study in Sweden had found more people in favour of the country joining NATO than were against it.



Continue Reading


Putin humiliated: Russia tries and fails to capture defiant Ukraine village for tenth time




Russia has tried and failed to capture the village of the Chornobaevka ten times, according to Ukrainian presidential adviser Aleksey Arestovich. Videos shared by Ukrainian officials online showed the “tenth defeat of the Russian invaders in Chornobaevka”. The continued failures to capture the village comes as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said last night that his country’s forces had “dealt powerful blows” to the Russian military.

Mr Arestovich told a press conference that Russian troops had tried to take Chornobaevka for the tenth time, but the assault again ended in failure.

Following this, the head of the nearby Mykolaiv Regional State Administration Vitaly Kim published a video showing “the defeat” as explosions erupt on the outskirts of the village.

The resolute village has become famous in Ukraine for its defence, as President Zelensky commended Chornobaivka last weekend for fending off six invasions at the time.

He said: “Ukrainian Chornobaivka will go down in war history. This is a place where the Russian military and their commanders have shown themselves for who they truly are – incompetent, capable of simply handing over their people for slaughter.

“Our military has annihilated the invaders near Chornobaivka six times.

“Six times, yet they keep coming back.”

JUST IN: Putin on brink of major RETREAT in Kyiv

Online users ridiculed the latest Russian failures and hailed the Ukrainian defiance, with one Reddit user remarking: “At some point, I think every military intelligence outfit looking at this must be wondering how bad the rot is in the Russian military.”

One user visavillem added: “So this is the 10th time. Are Russians trying to bait Ukrainians to waste ammo with some obsolete/broken equipment, or are they really so stupid, that they keep stepping on the same rake again and again?”

Another user on Reddit adfgqert posted: “The Ukrainian people have resolve and determination that is beyond what I think is normal.

“Beyond inspirational and they bring fighting for what they believe in to a new level for me.” 

This comes amid ongoing setbacks for Russian military forces in the south of the country.

Earlier this week, it was reported that Russia had withdrawn most of its helicopters from a strategic airport in Kherson, in southern Ukraine, according to satellite images.

Kherson has also been the site of several local protests against the occupying Russian soldiers.

The official said: “We can’t corroborate exactly who is in control of Kherson but the point is, it doesn’t appear to be as solidly in Russian control as it was before.

“That would make it very, very difficult for them to make any kind of ground movement on Odesa.

“That would be a significant development, no question about that, in terms of the southern part of the war.” 


Continue Reading